Building Community in the Online Classroom, or: Rehumanizing Online Learning

As the 2013-2014 academic year approaches, I find myself in a situation that is somewhat odd: I’m charged with teaching an advanced composition course to students in the Oxford, MS area, but I’m doing so in an online environment while I work from home in Chattanooga, TN. Creating a sense of community is one of my first goals in a writing classroom, and while I’ve been teaching online courses for the last three years, I find myself really stumped this time around.

In the past, I have taught online classes at a community college located in Chattanooga. The classes have been pre-designed, and I’ve been expected to step in as a TA of sorts. I graded papers, I answered emails, I tended to specific snafus that cropped up, but I wasn’t responsible for any of the design work.

As I stare down the responsibility of designing this class, I find myself looking for reasons to avoid it—and I’m not a procrastinator by nature. Being baffled by this, I spent this past weekend reflecting on my fear of this course and my willingness to put off the responsibility. The most obvious culprit is the blatant responsibility I feel, but my intimidation goes deeper than that. My biggest problem with this course design is that I don’t know how to make a composition course—a course central to the Humanities field—feel like a human experience. I don’t know how to create community in an online writing environment. My past experience with online learning has been primarily humanities courses that study history, art, literature, political movements, and various other facets of what it means to be human. I’ve also taught literature classes that require that the students focus on reading poetry, drama, short stories, and novels. The central elements of these courses require discussion and ask that students challenge their worldviews and try on new theories of what it means to be part of a society. These things require student community, and the community usually crops up on its own without very much prompting from me.

Writing is a comparatively solitary experience for our students, though. The task is so heavy, the assignments so intimidating, and the grading so esoteric that the students are often scared to share their writing with each other and intimidated by the responsibility of sharing feedback with their classmates. As instructors, we see that writing can be a community activity. Going to a coffee shop with a friend to work on writing assignments together can provide a much-needed sounding board and a built-in source of feedback. Reading a colleague’s writing helps that colleague, but it also helps you as you get to see how someone else presents written ideas.

Our students, unfortunately, don’t see it this way, so I’m faced with the challenge of creating a sense of community in an online writing classroom. My first solution was to make sure that I create peer review discussion boards that require regular attention from students and that involve specific responses to classmates’ ideas. While I think this is an important facet of the online classroom, I’m just not sure that weekly discussion boards are the most practical way to ensure engaged student involvement. I’ve seen too many students resort stock responses that stop at “I think this sounds great!” or “I don’t see any problems here!”—especially towards the end of the semester when everyone, including myself, is tired.

Instead, I’m in the process of fleshing out a system that alternates peer review discussion boards and interpersonal verbal interaction between my students and me. Letting the students see my face, hear my voice and verbalize questions are essential elements of keeping the composition classroom humanized and to reminding them that there is a teacher behind a computer screen somewhere invested in their success and hoping to help them grow as writers.

I’ve come up with three specific ideas so far:

1)    Periodically, I will hold online office hours in which students will talk with me via Skype, Google Hangout, or Blackboard chat—a function of Blackboard much like a chatroom which students can log in to and interact with anyone else who is logged in. One day I believe we should be able to require that online students purchase a webcam to use for Skype or Google Hangout meetings. This $15 (approximate) purchase may do more to ensure success in the online classroom than expensive handbooks that include information accessible on free and very reliable websites like Purdue OWL.

2)    When we do have discussion boards, students will be required to reference something we discussed during a previous online meeting to show that they are internalizing the information gained during those meetings.

3)    I plan to post a video (recorded with my cell phone, laptop, or tablet) every week that’s about 2-3 minutes long. These videos will include a description of the reading assignments, the writing goals for the week, and any upcoming due dates, along with a reminder that we have a discussion board or mandatory meetings coming up.

This plan will take some tweaking, but I’m excited to implement it and see what needs to change the next time I teach this course. Any suggestions from readers will be greatly appreciated, so if you have advice you’d like to share with me and our other readers, please do!

3 thoughts on “Building Community in the Online Classroom, or: Rehumanizing Online Learning

    • Author gravatar

      You are faced with an interesting challenge, Victoria – one that I have yet to tackle (and have felt a little intimidated by), so I’m really interested to talk more about the online classes when you come to Oxford for TCW. Are you going to use Google Hangouts for peer feedback as well? I haven’t tried it yet with my students, but I’ve used GH for my own work, and having the face-to-face interaction makes such a difference. I bet your students would get a kick out of it.

      • Author gravatar

        Using Google Hangouts for peer feedback would be so useful! If you were to use it for your own students, would you monitor the peer review sessions? Or just trust that students get out of it what they need to get out of it?

        • Author gravatar

          I taught fully online for the first time this past spring, and I can relate to the desire to build community in what can be an isolating environment. I’ve actually used YouTube for peer reviews – that way students do not have to be able to “meet” online, but rather students post videos of themselves talking about each partner’s paper, usually in response to specific questions I provide. Students then share that link with their partner and with me. Students (and the instructor) then have the opportunity to view peer reviews of their papers with a real person doing the reviewing. Some students even posted responses to their peer’s review video. I suggested Google Hangout as an option as well (which can be recorded and shared, but requires that the students coordinate a time to meet online and remember to record), but had no takers. I’d say if you spend the time instructing them how to use Google Hangout, you’d get more willing participants.

          Another way to build community in an online course, I found, was to post individual video feedback to each student’s multimodal project – a brief 2 minute video of the instructor talking directly to you about your paper (via YouTube) helps create a personal experience.

          As for the weekly videos – I strongly believe these are useful, and many students will watch them and have a better sense of who you are and what you expect as a result. Some students, however, will not even watch a 2 minute YouTube video and therefore they miss out on important information and a personal connection. One change I am making for this upcoming semester to address this problem is to have a brief quiz following each video – with questions that can be automatically scored by Bb and only answered if students viewed the video.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.